![Analyzing the Hockey Canada trial [3] artwork](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftjxiqxsvxgmruqhgbwrk.supabase.co%2Fstorage%2Fv1%2Fobject%2Fpublic%2Fpodcast-images%2Fepisodes%2F2557d3cc-1218-4467-b828-2f1afcc9c342%2F58cd895f934977ff.jpg&w=1536&q=75)
![Analyzing the Hockey Canada trial [3] artwork](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftjxiqxsvxgmruqhgbwrk.supabase.co%2Fstorage%2Fv1%2Fobject%2Fpublic%2Fpodcast-images%2Fepisodes%2F2557d3cc-1218-4467-b828-2f1afcc9c342%2F58cd895f934977ff.jpg&w=1536&q=75)
[Part 3 of 5] In Part 3, we unpack the confusing timeline of Room 209 and the contradictions at the heart of the case. A clear pattern emerges: the five accused players were repeatedly given the benefit of the doubt, while E.M. was scrutinized and cast as unreliable. Thanks for your patience…